There are scientific sources that affirm that communism is the extreme form of socialism, others affirm that after the Second World War, socialism appeared as a transformed form of communism.
Now, in terms of the economic focus of both we have;
COMMUNISM:
<em>The goods of production are handled by all, that is to say that the concept of property within the goods of production is annulled.
</em>
<em>
</em>
<em>The production is related only to meet human needs, without the need for money.
</em>
<em>
</em>
<em>Look for the condition in which material abundance exists.
</em>
SOCIALISM:
<em>The means of production are from public companies or cooperatives.
</em>
<em>
</em>
<em>Individuals are compensated according to the principle of individual contribution.
</em>
<em>
</em>
<em>Production can be coordinated by economic planning or economic markets.</em>
In the novel Nectar in a Sieve by Kamala Markandaya, water is a symbol that moves and ends all other symbols. Water through the rain affects the yields of the rice, also, it can come in the form of monsoon to come unexpectedly and also to go, and never can say with certainty when the rain will come and go on a daily basis. Water as a symbol fits perfectly into the type of Hindu religion, which has cyclicality, a circular flow between life and death. The water is present when Nathan dies, the rain that floods the flames on the temple, reminds that no force can resist inevitable death. Also, water is compared with a woman, if nature is dry, it is like a infertile woman, if too immoral is used, then nature is too "mature", so water must be used moderately, or there are dangerous consequences. The relationship between woman and water is also given through the river, it gives life in a moderate form, because the fields are more fertile and have a high yield, but also take life in unhealthy spills and floods. So water can mean an ascent or a fall if it is not used moderately, too much or too little use is not good. Thus, water symbolizes fertility or infertility, life or death, just as the point of the Hindu religion is the circulation of life and death.
Yes, it is true that <span>Herman Melville was an amazing writer of the 1800s. He used dialogue to help bring the characters in his stories to life, since he also inspired many future writers to adopt a similar style. </span>
Answer
I'm gonna say A because he always seemed calm in all the videos i've seen of him.
Explanation:
