Answer:
What is the time relationship between a President’s assumption of office and his taking the oath? Apparently, the former comes first, this answer appearing to be the assumption of the language of the clause. The Second Congress assumed that President Washington took office on March 4, 1789,1 although he did not take the oath until the following April 30.
That the oath the President is required to take might be considered to add anything to the powers of the President, because of his obligation to preserve, protect and defend the Constitution, might appear to be rather a fanciful idea. But in President Jackson’s message announcing his veto of the act renewing the Bank of the United States there is language which suggests that the President has the right to refuse to enforce both statutes and judicial decisions based on his own independent decision that they were unwarranted by the Constitution.2 The idea next turned up in a message by President Lincoln justifying his suspension of the writ of habeas corpus without obtaining congressional authorization.3 And counsel to President Johnson during his impeachment trial adverted to the theory, but only in passing.4 Beyond these isolated instances, it does not appear to be seriously contended that the oath adds anything to the President’s powers.
Topics
Elections and Voting Rights
Explanation:
Explanation:
from fighting the pandemic to reengineering American's politics , these influential women including NEW ZEALAND minister JACINDA ARDERN
VISE PRESIDENT-elect KAMALA HARRIS
and voting rights advocated STACY ADBRAMS- are making history
CARRY ON LEARNING
Answer:
The Agricultural Revolution of the 18th century paved the way for the Industrial Revolution in Britain.
Explanation: It is important to note industrialization also has resulted in being dependent on agriculture this leads to degrading natural resources, depletes human resources, and destroys economic opportunities. You will eventually need to put the two together in order to form a substansial econmy
Answer:
Explanation:
War (What is it good for?) was an anti-Vietnam War protest song, written by Norman Whitfield and recorded by Whitfield and the Temptations in 1969. ... In the wake of this success Starr used his growing profile to criticise American foreign policy in general and the Vietnam War in particular.
Answer:
no power to compel obedience if one state invaded another there was nothing to repelling the invasion
