Answer:
The answer is: a change in the price at which a substitute good is sold
Explanation:
A shift in supply means a change in the quantity supplied at every price.
Let's assume we sell product A. If the price of a substitute product B increases, then the quantity demanded for product A will increase as the quantity demanded for product B decreases. That will cause an increase in the quantity supplied of product A, which may in turn rise the price of product A until again both products (A and B) match their prices.
Instead, a shift in the supply curve means that the quantity supplied of a product will change at every price level.
Answer:
What is entirely true about this contract is:
The contract is a VALID contract but is also a VOIDABLE contract on the part of Larry but NOT on the part of Sprint.
Explanation:
As a minor, Larry (he was under the age of 18 when he signed the contract with Sprint) lacks the contractual capacity to enter into the contractual relationship with Sprint. But since he has signed the contract in exchange for the purchase of the cell phone, Larry can either honor the deal or void the contract. This is why the contract is said to be valid but voidable at Larry's behest. However, after Larry has turned 18, if he has not done anything to void the contract, then the contract with Sprint can no longer be voided.
Answer:
Variable overhead rate variance = $2,870 favorable
Explanation:
Variable overhead rate variance is the difference between the standard cost allowed for variable production overhead and the actual variable cost incurred.
This computed as follows:
$
17,130 hours should have cost ( 17,130 ×7.20) 123336
but did cost <u>120,466</u>
Variable overhead rate variance <u> 2870
</u> Favorable
Variable overhead rate variance = $2,870
Answer:
$12,500
Explanation:
Calculation for the total amount removed from Joshua’s estate in 2017
Since we were told that In 2016, Joshua gave the amount of $12,500 to his son in which in the same year which was 2017, the XYZ shares are worth the amount of $25,000 which means that the total amount removed from Joshua’s estate in 2017 will be $12,500 ($25,000-$12,500).
