Answer:
In order of what you said,
1. Motion for Suppression
2. Motion for Continuance
3. Motion for Discovery
4. Motion for Bill of Particulars
Explanation:
I got this correct.
PLATO gang
That is false I’m thinking
Answer:
The Supreme Court case District of Columbia v. Heller was a landmark case that determined that the Second Amendment protects an individual’s right to possess a firearm, unconnected with service in a militia, for traditionally lawful purposes, such as self-defense within the home. This case is significant in regards to the Second Amendment because it affirms that the right to bear arms is an individual right, and not just a right that pertains to militias.
Explanation:
Hope this helps!
Answer: <em>Social dumping</em>
Explanation:
<em>Social dumping</em> is employers ' method of using cheaper labor than is usually available at their production or sales site. In the latter case, it hires migrant workers; in the former, it transfers production to a low-wage country or area. Therefore, the company will save money and potentially increase its profit. Systemic analysis indicates that governments are therefore forced to participate in a so-called social policy system by increasing their labor and social standards in order to ease labor costs for businesses and maintain business activity within their jurisdiction.
<em>Entities derived from social dumping: </em>
- companies in importing countries
- Participants in importing countries
- Customers in importing countries
- Industry in importing markets
- Employment in exporting countries
- Government and investment in exporting countries
Answer:
<u>Her actions were illegal</u>
Explanation:
We could make the conclusion that the attorney's actions were illegal. Consider, under the requirements of the law, an attorney acts as a representative to clients by giving advice to the clients, etc.
But they do not have the responsibility of making decisions for their clients <em>except</em> they receive the consent of their clients.
