The last answer option is correct. This option states that:
"You definitely have an insider’s view on this situation. Evidence from your own life shouldn’t be used to analyze another writer’s story, though."
<h2>Why would this be the peer reviewer's suggestion?</h2>
- A peer reviewer is someone who will give suggestions.
- These suggestions aim to make the text more coherent, efficient, and meaningful.
- In this case, a peer reviewer will give suggestions and how to improve the text and will show the author what should be removed or added.
In the case of the text Jaime, the peer reviewer must show how he cannot infer about the life of another writer based on evidence from his personal life. However, this inference must be made through evidence from the writer's own life.
More information about reviews in the link:
brainly.com/question/20466874
Answer:
Wait what is the question your asking?
Explanation:
.
Answer:
Inductive, weak
Explanation:
<u>This is an inductive argument because it is using a personal preference</u> to refer to the red wines from Australia, <u>instead of using an unbiased fact</u> like some professional taster's review of the red wines that the argument talks about and is weak because of the poor management of words it uses, it says "all red wines" while it only talks about 3 red wines.
Answer:
<h2>cu = control unit</h2>
~ƒöᏝϗʆѻʁᶥąռ¹₃
