Answer:
the Three-Fifths Compromise vs. the Great Compromise
Explanation:
When the Articles of Confederation underwent revision, there were many issues that were discussed. One of the major issues was the debate over the the Three-Fifths Compromise vs. the Great Compromise. According to the Great Compromise, an equal right was to be distributed among the citizens to choose the representatives.
In the Three-Fifths Compromise, no debates were initiated on the issue of the complete abolition of slavery and granting them the citizenship. The slaves were agreed to be counted to be the three-fifth of the individual who were liable for taxation and representation.
It would be absolute monarchy
Answer:
it Bridges disagreement and discussion or it encourages people to speak up without fear
Explanation:
I I think it's the third one
The 3/5 compromise is when 3 out of 5 slaves count for representatives . So this represents the interest of both northern and southern states by showing that they wanted representation in population in order for each state to be more powerful than the other.