hi there!! your answer for this question is:
B. he wants the audience to feel william kamkwamba is speaking directly to them.
your answer is correct! good luck!! <3
Konichiwa~! My name is Zalgo and I am here to help you out on this marvelous day. The answer to your question is C; Normalcy. It wouldn't be communism because that would be the hatred or murderous intent for the foreigners. It isn't Liberalism because that would be the curiosity of the foreigners. And it isn't democracy because then the foreigners would be political.
I hope that this helps! :3
"Stay Brainly and stay proud!" - Zalgo
(By the way, do you mind marking me a Brainliest? I'd greatly appreciate it! Arigato~! C:)
Answer:
The basis of this argument is that verbs are conjugated only in the present and past tense. If we want to refer to the future, we have to use the auxiliary verb will, or the be going to phrase followed by the verb in present or past, or the present tense. Since in English, there is no change in the conjugation of the verbs for the future, some linguistics claim that there are two tenses (past and present) while others claim that there are three because we form the future tense with the addition of the auxiliary or use present simple or continuous.
Explanation:
Linguistics such as Quicker Al claims that there are two tenses, present, and past since they are expressed by inflections in their verbs, while future does not have inflections. There is no future tense, but there is future time. Time is related to our perception of reality, making the future subjective. On the other side, tense expresses when an action happens, taking into account the moment that the person is speaking. Linguistics such as Hatav or Klein claims three tenses' existence, past, present, and future. They state that we can refer to the future with the addition of the auxiliary verb will, or the phrase be going to, or the use of present simple, or continuous even though there is no specific inflection in the verb, as it happens in other languages like Portuguese or Spanish. They identify the future with the definition of tense.
Answer:
Romeo is the male lead in the play and acts as the play’s hero. He is central to the plot through his relationship with Juliet, the heroine, and many of Romeo’s choices govern the action in the play. For example, his choice to go to the Capulet feast against his better judgement leads to him meeting Juliet. His choice to avenge Mercutio’s death leads to his banishment and the desperate plan he and Juliet embark upon to be reunited, which ends in their death.
TIP:
It is important to look at Romeo’s actions in Act V Scene 3. Make notes on what he does and why you think he acts as he does (for example, lying to Balthasar and killing Paris in fury). Do these actions match our earlier impressions of Romeo’s character? Is Romeo just the sensitive and romantic young man we considered him to be in Act I?
