One of the contrasts between the Roman Republic and the Roman Empire that tailed it was the previous republic's failure to deal with the enormous measure of region that it had procured. The Roman Empire, in any case, could control Rome's property and stayed more successful at smothering common agitation. By evacuating the arrangement of balanced governance that were set up amid the republic, the Roman Empire's occupant head could react rapidly and with more noteworthy compel to any apparent or unfurling danger.
It was deloped by which the peasants of Medieval Europe became dependent on their land and lords. I hope this helps!
Answer:A woman
Explanation:
In her name he could do good deeds
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Although there are no options provided, we can say the following.
John Marshall's approach was different from the role envisioned for the court by the writers of the Constitution in that Marshall believed the United States Constitution granted strong federal powers; Jefferson did not.
John Marshall was a federalist. Thomas Jefferson was not. He was an anti-federalist. Then, Marshall considered the idea of a strong central government. On the other side, Jefferson thought that a strong government was not the better option for a new nation, and even worse, a strong federal government could turn into a tyranny.
Answer:
Its D
Explanation:
For Federalists, the Constitution was required in order to safeguard the liberty and independence that the American Revolution had created.
