<span>The author, Ron Chernow, presents Hamilton as an overly ambitious man but his ambitions were motivated not by egocentric deeds but by passion and determination to build the foundations of American success and prosperity. Clearly, his actions were influenced by ambition and not by principle. This is expressed in one example as written by Chernow, “To repudiate his legacy.” Another is “in many ways, to repudiate the modern world.” </span>
John's therapist strives to provide an atmosphere of acceptance and respect, no matter what comes up during the sessions. In Carl Roger's terms, John's therapist is providing <span> unconditional positive regard.
</span>The humanistic psychologist Carl Roger developed the concept of unconditional positive regard , a technique that <span>involves showing complete support and acceptance of a person no matter what that person says or does.</span>
Answer:
(A) Egypt
Explanation:
Suez Crisis was the invasion of the Egypt in the late 1956 by the Israel which was followed by the United Kingdom and the France. After fighting had started, the political pressure from United States, Soviet Union and United Nations led to the withdrawal by three invaders.
Nasser officially recognized People's Republic of China on 16 May 1956, which angered U.S. and Secretary Dulles which was a sponsor of Republic of China.This move was then coupled with impression that project was beyond the Egypt's economic capabilities and caused the Eisenhower to withdraw all the American financial aid for Aswan Dam project on 19 July.
The answer is <u>"c. a confounding variable is an explanatory variable that was considered in a study whose effect cannot be distinguished from a second explanatory variable in the study."</u>
A confounding variable is an outside impact that progressions the impact of a dependent and independent variable. This superfluous impact is utilized to impact the result of an exploratory plan. Just, a confounding variable is an additional variable went into the condition that was not represented. Confounding variables can destroy an analysis and deliver pointless outcomes. They propose that there are connections when there truly are most certainly not. In an examination, the independent variable by and large affects the dependent variable.
Answer:
<em>I can see that there are no choices.</em>
fallacy of bandwagon
Explanation:
A "logical fallacy" refers to the error of reasoning or logical gap that makes an argument invalid.
The situation above commits the fallacy of the bandwagon because the argument is being supported only according to a significant number of population. This is a fallacy because it doesn't necessarily mean all of the retired persons are unhappy about the level of Social Security assistance due to the opinion of 30 persons who agreed that they were unhappy. It becomes a "standalone justification" of the validity of an argument. We cannot judge the happiness or unhappiness of all retired persons according only to a group of 30 persons <em>(even though they were chosen from different parts of the country). </em>
So, this explains the answer.
