Answer:
<h2><em><u>n</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>=</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>7</u></em></h2>
Step-by-step explanation:
4(n-1)+2 = -23 +7n
=> 4n - 4 + 2 = - 23 + 7n
=> 23 - 4 + 2 = 7n - 4n
=> 21 = 3n

=> <em><u>n</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>=</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>7</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>(</u></em><em><u>Ans</u></em><em><u>)</u></em>
2x² + x - 3
2x² - 2x + 3x - 3
2x(x) - 2x(1) + 3(x) - 3(1)
2x(x - 1) + 3(x - 1)
(2x + 3)(x - 1)
Answer:
The number is 4
Step-by-step explanation:
Let the number = 'x'
Reciprocal of 'x' = 1/x
Reciprocal of 2 = 1/2
8 times the reciprocal of 'x' = 

Now multiply both sides by x

Now divide both sides by 2

x = 4
Linear pair angles, which are angles that together form a straight line are
supplementary angles.
The one that completed the proof incorrectly is <u>Becky</u>.
Reasons:
The two column proof is presented as follows;
Statement
Reason
1. Segment GH intersects segment AB at K
1. Given
2. m∠AKG + m∠HKB = 180°
2.Definition of Supplementary Angles
m∠GKB + m∠HKB = 180°
3. m∠AKG + m∠HKB = m∠GKB + m∠HKB
3. Substitution property
4. m∠AKG = m∠HKB
4. Subtraction Property
The difference between Angie's Proof and Becky's Proof is in Statement 2.
- Angie states that; m∠AKG + m∠HKB = 180° and m∠GKB + m∠HKB = 180° by definition of Supplementary Angles
- Becky states that; m∠AKG + m∠HKB = 180° and m∠GKB + m∠HKB = 180° by Angle Addition Postulate
Becky's proof is incorrect because the measure of angles m∠AKG and
m∠HKB and m∠GKB and m∠HKB are not given, therefore, the use of the
reason of Angle Addition Postulate in statement 2. is incorrect.
Learn more here:
brainly.com/question/13204208