Answer:
If your options are:
A. The poem uses variations of meter to affect rhyme.
B. The poem’s sentences flow across stanzas.
C. The poem’s stanzas have varying lengths.
D. The poem uses nontraditional syntax and rhyme scheme.
Then the answer is D.
Explanation:
The nontraditional syntax is best shown in the use of enjambment - interrupting the thought and syntactic structure in the middle and moving the rest to the next line. For example: "and older than the // flow of human blood (...)"
Here, the definite article "the" has been separated from the noun "flow", which means the phrase is visually broken in half.
- A isn't true because this poem conveys its meaning through rhythm and not rhyme. There are virtually no rhymes here and the syntax (sentence structure) is disrupted, invoking the sound of a river flowing in irregular but consistent waves.
- B isn't true because the sentences do flow across lines but not across stanzas.
- The stanzas do have varying lengths. But even though this element was pretty rare prior to the 20th century, it is not exclusive to modernist poetry. That's why C isn't true either.
The correct answer for this question is this one: "2. by describing a mysterious and nervous stranger." The part of Lanyon’s letter help create suspense <span>by describing a mysterious and nervous stranger. It is quite uneasy for a person to meet a stranger. It is something that is new for him or her.
</span>
Statistically, it is proven that the most dangerous, ____ risk years of your driving career are the first years. <span>A. high</span>
Answer:
I have an answer:)
Explanation:
You cam convince an audience that you are trustworthy by giving great facts and using sources. This is very important because with great evidence to back you up, your opinion shows that others agree with you. Another way, is to connect with your audience. Whoever that may be, try to talk about something they like and just make sure that it somewhat has something to do with what your point is about.
