Judicial restraint is the political theory that says courts shouldn't, unless absolutely required, issue rulings that broaden or alter the character of existing laws.
<h3>Justiciable constraint is exercised by whom?</h3>
A jurist (judge or justice) who upholds a philosophy of restraint can be described as one who considers democracy to have intrinsic, rather than just instrumental, value, that the judiciary is indeed the least powerful of the three branches of government, and who values stability and predictability in the lawmaking process.
<h3>Why do advocates of judicial restraint assert that judges are impervious to public sentiment?</h3>
They are freed from the strain of the outer world of public opinion since they do not have to worry about being reelected. In the end, the majority may not always be correct. The fact that the Founders established appointed judges and elected legislators is not by coincidence.
Learn more about Judicial restraint: brainly.com/question/29545866
#SPJ4
Answer:
when there is reported criminal activity and in order to convict the accused, evidence is now needed to prove the accused guilty without a reasonable doubt.
Answer:
So before you do any thing you want to make sure you have gloves on so you can try to pull finger prints. Second you want to get the gun and clear (pulling the slide back look down to where the mag is then through the barrel )after pick up the bullets then you can use the liver temp of the body to determine a time of death. Next you will want to run the ballistics on the gun(make sure it was recently fired) then make sure the bullets are the same caliber as the gun after you find the match you want to do a autopsy on the body to find any bruises gang tatts or anything he recently ate after that you can use the finger prints found at the crime scene and the food he had recently ate to determine where he was and who was with him.
Explanation:
You are welcome mark me brainliest please
Answer: A very interesting question and I too have had It It is very difficult and I have found the answer! (Read Explanation)
Explanation:
If a woodchuck could chuck wood? As much wood as a woodchuck could chuck, If a woodchuck could chuck wood.
Ethics are the MORAL PRINCIPLES that govern a person's behavior or the conducting of an activity.
