The statement "Everyone has the right to recognition everywhere as a person before the law," helps develop an idea about human rights in many ways. The first is that in this statement, it acknowledges the accused as a person not based off of social class or status, but rather the fact that they are a human being. They imply that the person has undeniable rights as a human being, or in their specific words, as a person.
Answer:
i think answer is a but i am not sure but i think this is only the answer
<h3>My defense and argument claim why tigers would beat most animals.</h3>
Tigers are very strong and intelligent animals. They can jump from place to place, leaping about 20 feet each time, which may help them in fights. Tigers also have good eyesight which allows them to see some things we do not. Then, someone argues to the claim, saying, "Tigers cannot beat every animal alone".
And this person is correct, tigers actually cannot beat every animal by themselves. Although they have mostly superior strength, there is one exception; A tiger goes against a group of strong foes. This is the case in which a tiger may fail to defeat its opponent. Hence, the tiger would only beat most animals in a fight, not all.
Answer:
happiness upon returning home
