We need more info to answer this question
The correct answer is option D " …in a changing world worthy institutions can be conserved only by adjusting them to the changing time". Calvin Coolidge was the 30th president of the United States, a republican lawyer that had a successful political life. His philosophy against active government was that institution should change with the government in order to stay active and productive to the society.
Answer:
<em>The leader in your group determines what gets made with the wood and how much of it</em>
<em></em>
Explanation:
Since there is a bountiful amount of wood resources available in the forest, we will have the luxury of utilizing the forest resources for firewood, shelter, furniture, boats, and so on. The fact that there is a bountiful supply of forest resources can lead to improper or devastating extraction of wood materials from the forest. This wrong harvesting can damage the forest. The best choice to determine what and how to use the forest is for the leader to determine how much of the necessary materials can be made with the woods, and how much of the wood can be used. This sensible utilization of the wood material will ensure that the forest is preserved as much as possible.
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Although there are no options attached, we can say the following.
The organization and class structures of settler communities were different from those of sugar colonies in that the settler communities had religious and businessmen, as well as religious people that were at the top of the social class of these colonies.
The settler colonies continually displaced the Native American Indian tribes from their territories, causing many conflicts that derived in wars. These settlers wanted more and more land to exploit the many raw materials and natural resources.
On the other hand, the colonies that grew sugar in North America, such as Maryland, North, and South Carolina, Virginia, and Georgia.
Answer:
Plessy v. Ferguson, 163 U.S. 537 (1896), was a landmark decision of the U.S. Supreme Court that upheld the constitutionality of racial segregation laws for public facilities as long as the segregated facilities were equal in quality – a doctrine that came to be known as "separate but equal".
Explanation:
