Um what type of teacher would-
<h3>Answer:</h3><h2>It supported establish trade relationships and supported the spread of Islam.</h2>
<h3>Explanation:</h3>
By going to Mali, Mansa Musa supported spread the thoughts of Mali a way that represented the strength and prosperity of the empire, thus he yielded Mali an even bigger world power.
He further helped spread Islam to not just amongst the natives of the nation of Mali, but further between others, for they perceived Mali as a role model so to speak and when the most dominant man in the world recommends something, several others will support in connection.
Definitely harmful, the Catholic Church is actually what really caused the problems because the interaction between the two made diseases spread, and fights begin when Native Americans didn't want to change
Look at the chart that I have attached. The low point was between 55 or 60 to 381. When you look at something like Bitcoin, that doesn't look like it was very much, but there are two things that you really have to keep in mind.
1. Most people had only about 10% of the price of the stock covered. What that means is that if a stock cost 100 dollars, most people had only 10 dollars holding it down. The rest was put up by the bank. The market was doing such crazy things that I don't even think the banks checked into your credit. The stock was holding down what you owed. The bank only got its share when you sold. Preposterous!!! It sure was.
2. The second thing is that the numbers I've given you were the Dow Jones Industrial Average. That's the cream of the cream on the NY stock exchange. Who knows what was going on with companies that were not that big. They were what the economic writers would have called "Good Speculations," which translated into "go mortgage your house, sell your furniture, back up the truck (and then sell it too) and buy xzy. You'll never be broke again."
That by the way is why bitcoin and all its relatives is so dangerous.
Answer:
C
Explanation:
Since the employee was upset and lying it was likely the lie in the newspaper was defamation