1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
bekas [8.4K]
3 years ago
14

Sawarasenai kimi wa shojo nano??

Law
2 answers:
miv72 [106K]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

Sawarasenaikimiwa⛓shoujonano?✨böKùWâÿARiçHiñBįCChīńOoŠuDàYO

Explanation:

:O

insens350 [35]3 years ago
4 0
Say what now I don’t understand this.
You might be interested in
Assume that the U.S. Congress has passed a federal statute that is in conflict with a Wisconsin state constitutional provision.
vredina [299]

Answer: It is not.

Explanation:

The U.S. Constitution has a clause known as the Supremacy Clause that places the Constitution of the United States as well as all Federal law that are not in violation of the Constitution above State laws and Constitutions.

This is why Federal Voting rights were able to prevail over the State Constitutions in the South after the Civil War.  

For this reason, the Federal Statute enacted by Congress will take precedence over the Wisconsin State Constitutional Provision.

3 0
2 years ago
A person who believes a judge has behaved unethically while presiding over the case should file a complaint with which entity
Nana76 [90]

Answer:

He shouldnt file a complaint

Explanation:

he shouldnt file a complaint because he wants the judge to go in hid favor and he needs to be nice to the judge

8 0
2 years ago
Prisons are typically under whose control?
Olin [163]

Prisons are typically under the control of the state or federal government. In state or federal government also there are two sections namely Department of justice (DOJ), Bureau of prisons (BOP).

8 0
2 years ago
Do you agree that the states should have to provide a lawyer to someone accused of committing a serious crime?
spayn [35]

Answer:

Yes I agree that a lawyer should be provide for someone accused of committing a serious crime. I agree because they are being ACCUSED it doesn't mean that they have committed that crime that is why they need someone to fight for them.

Explanation:

sorry if i am wrong

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What will your phone do in Do Not Disturb mode?
Masteriza [31]
C. Mute itself from all vibrations and alerts
6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • The additional standard for age 65 and older or blind
    8·1 answer
  • One of the ways Aristotle classified governments was by number of
    5·1 answer
  • Matt goes out to dinner at 6pm and has 5 beers (12 oz) with his dinner. He then goes out
    12·2 answers
  • Which example represents a reserved power?
    10·1 answer
  • The types of cases a court can hear is referred to as its
    14·2 answers
  • Which of the following are examples of compassion?
    11·1 answer
  • What best describes the 3 major threats in Air Transport?
    5·1 answer
  • Cuales son las diferencia entre la declaracion de los derechos humanos de 1789 y la de 1948
    7·1 answer
  • The Judiciary Act of 1789 established all of the following EXCEPT
    11·1 answer
  • Lawyers sometimes overestimate the likelihood of meeting their goals (like acquittal) and also of their ability to ______.
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!