The correct answer should be assimilation.
According to the psychological definition, assimilation is when somebody uses the existing knowledge to include something new in it. So, this kid knew what a bird is - he knows that it can fly. So when he saw a flying squirrel, he thought it was a bird, because he didn't know that there are squirrels who can do that.
Sherman antitrust act I believe.
A copywright protects any tangible form of expression.
Answer: C. the individuals who were relatively unprejudiced became even less prejudiced and the individuals who were relatively prejudiced became even more prejudiced.
Explanation: The scenario above could be explained using the risky or choice shift phenomenon which is a study which explains how decisions made by individuals when alone and when part of a group differs. The study shows that decisions made when individuals form part of a group often tends to be riskier than when such decision is made alone.
This is the reason why individuals who were relatively unprejudiced before the discussion became even less prejudiced after the discussion and the individuals who were relatively prejudiced before the discussion became even more prejudiced after the discussion.
This could be due to the fact that they want to be in line with other members or do not want to let them down. Or belief that shared risk decreases level of individual risk.
There really aren't choices to it, unless you state it in a more professional way. But here is how I would put it: The Relations between Native Americans and Colonists There are many reasons Native Americans and European Colonists did not have a good relationship. The reason for conflict between Colonist and Indians was due to the Colonists insatiable greed for power and land.
