They can go undercover
They just simply have to cover their identity
I believe television is more effective than radio because, television provide a visual image of certain things, and people find visuals more appealing and favorite more than listening to someone speaking. The images tend to capture the mind of the viewer causing them to be more attracted to a certain thing, causing it to have a greater influence on public opinion. For example, If Pepsi chose to create an advertisement in a radio by just simply stating that it's refreshing and saying that you should buy it. But Coca Cola chose to make an ad on TV by showing people enjoying the drink by the pool in a summer day, you are more likely to chose Coke because it appealed to you more than Pepsi. So I think that's why Television is more effective in influencing public opinion than a radio.
Hope this helps you
<span>located near active volcanoes</span>
Answer:
protect against one branch dominating
Explanation:
To prevent the government from becoming the tyrannical, the founding fathers believed that they need to implement a system that can overrule government officials at any time. The system of checks and balance is one of the method that they do to achieve this.
Currently, American government is divided into three branches. Executive, Legislative, and Judicial Branch.
Our current system provide each Branch with the power to intervene with the decisions made in other branches. (For example, the legislative branch want to pass a law that is unconstitutional, the judicial branch could prevent it through the judicial review process)
Answer:
It depends on your way of thinking. The Framers created a representative democracy because they were fearful of direct democracy. They were afraid that people would take their power away. In some cases, it would be better to have a representative democracy than a direct democracy and vice versa. Never the less, the Framers were afraid of what would happen if they did have a direct democracy.
