According to your definition: Modesty means the quality or state of being unassuming or moderate in the estimation of one's ability.
And, Now we require to define it in our way, and in easy language.....So, We can say that !!
❍ Modesty - It is the quality of not being much proud or confident about ourselves or on our abilities. Let's see some examples to capture properly:
- She accepted the award with modesty.
- There was no false modesty in her victory speech.
- Because of her modesty, the young woman was uncomfortable wearing a bathing suit in public.
- Many religions emphasize modesty and being reserved in appearance.
<u>━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━</u>
Answer:
the match was not played by them
Your answer is D).
She believed it was to <span>provide balance and comfort to Americans in stressful times.
Hope this helps~!
~{Isle of flightless birds}</span>
Answer:
Friendship is considered to be valuable but not necessarily vital.
In “Society and Solitude” Ralph Waldo Emerson portrays how he feels that the independence can strengthen friendships. On the other hand, In “Nature” Emerson shows that the friend are trivial, that even when between the people exist close bounds each person is ultimately alone, in both text he considers the friendship trivial.
I think that this is a very hard question to answer. I think that many kings, fictional or not, possess both the bad and good traits of being a king.
In regards to Macbeth, he certainly possessed the ambition many would wish for a king. He was brave, as noted by Duncan and the title of the Thane of Cawdor. He was protective, as noted by his murder of Banquo. Macbeth was even proud, as seen by his desire to keep the new title of Thane before taking the crown.
Unfortunately, many of the characteristics one would align with being a good king made Macbeth a bad king as well. Macbeth was too ambitious--as seen by his murdering Duncan. He was too protective--as seen by his inability to interpret the apparitions warnings in the correct way. Lastly, he was too proud--as seen by his refusal to leave the castle as Birnam Wood "moved" against him.
Like anything, one must always have control. Too much of anything normally turns out to be a bad thing. Therefore, depending upon one's individual views, Macbeth could be both a bad king or a good one.
BTW: It's free real estate.
