These fossils are very useful for us because we can use them to date the layers of rock that they are found in. Fossils that can be used in this way are called index fossils, and rock layers with the same index fossils in them can be correlated. Not my answer, link here for full
http://peter-mulroy.squarespace.com/correlating-rock-layers/
Answer:
I only know a few
1. aluminum
5.copper
4.zinc
2.sulphur ( specifically vulcanization of sulphur )
<span><span>Large nameplate capacity per plant, typically around 1 GW.
</span><span>Typically 90% capacity factor, maximizing output from the nameplate capacity.
</span><span>Small fuel transportation volumes as the fissionable material just isn't that big or heavy compared to equivalent fossil fuel BTU sources.
</span><span>Low CO2 per MWH on a full life cycle basis. ~12 grams which is only slightly more than wind / solar.
This is a reason nuclear is a much better source for one of the major pressing problems of today than fossil fuels: global warming.</span>No particulate matter pollution.No sulfur dioxide or other chemical pollution.<span>Low fatalities per TWH.
Nuclear is higher than renewables according to current statistics, but much, much lower than fossil fuel generation.</span></span>
Nuclear power generates lots of clean, stable energy.
seeks to help communities mitigate and adapt to climate change, as well as improve food security.
The correct answer for the given statement above would be true. Yes, it is true that local topography and sea surface temperature contribute to differences in climate between various localities. In fact, these factors contribute largely towards variations in the climate of places. Hope this answers the question.
