Which of the following most likely contributed to the

What statement best explains the relationship between satellite technology and the Internet?

Lesechka [4]

The statement which best explains the relationship between satellite technology and the internet is this: PEOPLE IN LESS DEVELOPED NATIONS USE SATELLITES TO ACCESS THE INTERNET, GREATLY INCREASING THE NUMBER OF INTERNET USERS.
It is on record that about 40% of the world population today have access to the internet compared to the less than 1% that had access to it in 1995. Internet access can be provided through a number of routes and satellite broadband route is one of them. This route is the one that is usually used in less developed countries.

7 0

3 years ago

Which of the following is the guiding economic philosophy of the free enterprise system

melamori03 [73]

In the free enterprise system, multiple companies are allowed to compete for your business which typically lowers prices.There are very few restrictions placed on the types of businesses and citizens who are allowed to participate within the free enterprise system. The consumer is what drives companies to sell, rather than the government telling them.

3 0

3 years ago

Why do modern countries not participate anarchy

ira [324]

Part of the Politics series
Basic forms of government
List of forms of government
show
Source of power
show
Power ideology
show
Power structure
A coloured voting box.svg Politics portal
vte
Anarchy is a society being freely constituted without authorities or a governing body. It may also refer to a society or group of people that entirely rejects a set hierarchy.[1] Anarchy was first used in English in 1539, meaning "an absence of government".[2] Pierre-Joseph Proudhon adopted anarchy and anarchist in his 1840 treatise What Is Property? to refer to anarchism,[3][4] a new political philosophy and social movement which advocates stateless societies based on free and voluntary associations. Anarchists seek a system based on the abolition of all coercive hierarchy, in particular the state, and many advocate for the creation of a system of direct democracy and worker cooperatives.[5][6]
In practical terms, anarchy can refer to the curtailment or abolition of traditional forms of government and institutions. It can also designate a nation or any inhabited place that has no system of government or central rule. Anarchy is primarily advocated by individual anarchists who propose replacing government with voluntary institutions. These true institutions or associations generally are modeled on nature since they can represent concepts such as community and economic self-reliance, interdependence, or individualism. Although anarchy is often negatively used as a synonym of chaos or societal collapse, this is not the meaning that anarchists attribute to anarchy, a society without hierarchies.[1] Proudhon wrote that anarchy is "Not the Daughter But the Mother of Order".[7]

7 0

3 years ago

16. Describe two benefits and two challenges of transitioning to a democratic form of government.

xz_007 [3.2K]

Answer:n modern political thought, there are two approaches to the justification of democracy as the best system of government: value-based and rationally utilitarian. Value justifications regard democracy as a value in itself, as a political system that most fully embodies the most important humanistic values: freedom, equality, justice, etc.

The value approach is criticized primarily for its appeal to a democratically minded person who is truly striving for freedom and political equality. However, in the modern world, very many people, if not most, prefer not freedom (which they often perceive even as anti-value), but material well-being, security, and order. Therefore, they put a non-political, social meaning in the most respected values of equality and justice, linking them to ensuring equal opportunities in life or rewarding merit, to which real democracy has a very weak relationship. All this casts doubt on the value group of arguments in favor of democracy.

A rational-utilitarian approach does not deny the certain significance of the value justifications of democracy, but at the same time pushes them to the background. This approach interprets democracy primarily as the most rational, useful way for citizens to organize a political system, allowing them to articulate and harmoniously combine their interests. The most consistently rational-utilitarian group of arguments is expressed in the systemic justifications of democracy: Democracy helps to prevent the rule of dictators, curb power, guarantee the protection of citizens from state arbitrariness; Democracy provides a higher level of economic development and higher rates of economic growth.

Of course, democracy, like any other political system, is not free from serious shortcomings, which, in fact, represent a continuation of its merits. Usually attention is paid to the following weaknesses of democracy:

1. The threat of destabilization of the political system arising from the very principle of election.

2. Political competition can result in conflict ogenicity, confrontation, open clashes and, therefore, destabilization of the situation in society.

3. The danger of the tyranny of the majority, confident in its "rightness" and suppressing the will of those who remain in the minority.

4. Possible unprofessionalism of officials elected by an incompetent majority.

Explanation:

Explanation: answer is more to the bottom

8 0

3 years ago

(Please use your own words) What is the main duty of the United States Supreme Court?

egoroff_w [7]

Answer:

it might be 3

Explanation:

As the final arbiter of the law, the Court is charged with ensuring the American people the promise of equal justice under law and, thereby, also functions as guardian and interpreter of the Constitution.

6 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers