1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
lutik1710 [3]
3 years ago
8

"Evaluate the extent to which different

History
1 answer:
pshichka [43]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

The Enlightenment

Bacon’s Rebellion

A City Upon A Hill

The house of burgesses

Plymouth and the Mayflower

7-Year-War

Explanation:

They all fostered unity.

You might be interested in
The Kansas-Nebraska Act allowed the territories of Kansas and Nebraska to decide the issue of slavery by popular sovereignty. Th
dezoksy [38]

Answer:

I'm pretty sure its B.

Explanation:

Kansas never became part of the confederacy. Kansas would've violated the Missouri compromise had they became part of the confederacy.

6 0
3 years ago
What did the writer of the letter to the Hebrews say God had promised?
yarga [219]
The essential purpose of this letter to the Hebrews, it was to exhort Christians to preserve in the face of persecution. the ultimate promise was of a redeemer, “the Messiah, and of his covenant that would bring righteousness before god”.
5 0
2 years ago
Select the letter of the correct answer.
Likurg_2 [28]
I think it would be B i am not 100% sure but lemme know if i helped
6 0
2 years ago
Which group in Hawaii was in favor of annexation by the United States?
REY [17]

Answer:

A. Ordinary Hawaiians

<h2>Who encouraged the annexation of Hawaii and why?</h2>

There is a complicated history behind the United States of America's eventual conquest of Hawaii. One that a little letter simply cannot do credit to. I will only briefly touch on some of the most significant incidents and overarching ideas.

One may start in 1851, when the French were mistreating the Hawaiian government once more and there was genuine danger that they would spiral out of control. Hawaii attempted to give sovereignty to the British as a result, but they showed little interest. They then came close to the USA. They signed a document transferring sovereignty to the United States in the event of war. But there was never a necessity (and it is unlikely that America was any more interested in being responsible for that faraway place than The United Kingdom was).

However, compared to other foreign states, Hawaii garnered more commercial and social attention from America. The problem of annexation became more pressing as trade links deepened over time. In the late 1860s and early 1870s the desire for a treaty of reciprocity for trade became so great that it was considered a matter of reciprocity or annexation.

Kalkaua was chosen as king by the Hawaiian legislature in 1874. This was mostly brought on by the mischief (er, influence) of regional American interests. They worried that Queen Emma, a popular figure and the widow of a past monarch, was too pro-British. He oversaw the signing of the reciprocity pact. It also gave America some access to the perhaps significant Pearl Harbor.

However, King Kalkaua had his own ideas about how to rule and resented the limitations that others tried to impose on him. He distinctly lost the support of the majority of Hawaii's "foreign" population. Since they were of foreign descent—in many cases, they were Hawaii citizens—we have put the word in quotation marks. The Kalkaua government was not just a nuisance, but also mocked for its various scandals. Many of them were due to the king’s attempting to acquire funds to promote his interests, private and public.

In 1887, everything came to a head. American citizens and those of American ancestry in particular staged a blatant uprising, forcing the monarch to sign a new constitution that, incidentally, severely curtailed the right to vote (those who qualified to vote). There were other famous organizers, including Lorrin A. Thurston.

Around this period, the American government started to take a more expansionist stance. James G. Blaine was appointed Secretary of State by the Harrison administration in 1889. He and John L. Stevens, his choice to serve as Hawaii's diplomatic ambassador, had a strong ambition to annex the islands to the United States. In addition, things started to move in Hawaii. The Annexation Club, a covert group, was created. Ostensibly not to precipitate annexation, but only to be ready if the need arose… In 1893, it did really arise.

Queen Liliuokalani, the monarch of Hawaii, aimed to impose a new constitution (essentially undoing the restrictions imposed in 1887). The anti-monarchical forces mobilized as a result, and the queen was overthrown. Even if he wasn't actively involved in the overthrow in this case, Minister Stevens was undoubtedly "dirty." He was in close communication with the leading revolutionaries, quickly recognized the new administration, and ordered American forces to land (as a "precaution"). The troops did little more than remain in their camp on the coast, but it was evident that their presence intimidated the overthrown administration.

Of course, the Provisional Government was eager for quick annexation by the United States (as suggested by its name). Sadly, Grover Cleveland had recently beaten Benjamin Harrison, and the new American administration was not interested in supporting them. In fact, they gave the monarchy some serious thought! But annexation had to wait till Hawaii was taken in with the spoils of the Spanish-American War because it was not to be.

Thank you,

Eddie

8 0
2 years ago
Which of these statements is true about the relationship between British policies in the colonies and the Declaration of Indepen
Alla [95]

Fuill question:

Which of these statements is true about the relationship between British policies in the colonies and the Declaration of Independence?

the DOI showed that the colonists approved of many British policies

the DOI listed colonial complaints about many British policies

the DOI was written before many of the policies were in place

the DOI had little to do with the British colonial policies

Answer:

the DOI listed colonial complaints about many British policies

Explanation:

In the declaration of independence, the founding fathers mentioned several problems within the British policies that caused a detrimental effect for the people who live in United States.

One of the example is taxation without representation.

The British government imposed a really high tax rate for the colonists to pay off their wars. But, they provide no opportunities for the colonists to choose their representations that can take part in the legislation process. This made the colonists felt the British empire acted like a big Bully who only want to take their resources without caring about their plight.

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Explain how the chesapeake and north carolina colonies grew prosperous exporting tobacco.
    5·1 answer
  • What do you know about art created outside Europe and the United States? List two things.
    9·1 answer
  • Who was first kenyan president
    10·2 answers
  • This prehistoric mammal came in all shapes and sizes,and remnants of them can be found all across North America
    8·1 answer
  • Put these in order 206 B.C. Great Wall of China finished 200 A.D. Paper is widely used in China 2008 A.D. China hosts the Summer
    5·1 answer
  • Is this right? Need help
    15·1 answer
  • The Emancipation proclamation was a law issued by Abraham Lincoln true or false
    9·2 answers
  • What was the state of the French government during Napoleon's exile?
    5·1 answer
  • How much did george rr martin contribute to elden ring?.
    6·1 answer
  • What was the overall change in co2 emissions for electricity generation from 1980 to 2005?.
    9·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!