3 years ago

Can someone give me a REAL answer pls:)

History

1 answer:

sladkih [1.3K]3 years ago

3 0

Answer:

Scott was considered as property that could not be taken from its owner.

Explanation:

In the way this ruling was written, Dred Scott didn't have the right to sue in a Missouri's courts, since he wasn't considered a citizen.

Section C also basically states the the Missouri Compromise was unconstitutional and was considered void, as it deprived a US citizen of their property, which is what slaves were considered as at the time.

You might be interested in

Do you agree with any of our nation's early leaders that America should have defeated Cuba sooner?

Bezzdna [24]

I’m not really sure on that i’m just glad they did

5 0

3 years ago

Why was control of the Atlantic Ocean essential to Great Britain's success in World War lI?

lesantik [10]

Control of the Atlantic ocean was a gateway for easy trade between other countries suck as Mexico,Africa,and possibly America. it could have also served as war territory for ships.

5 0

3 years ago

What were trade laws that any goods to or from the colonies to England had to be transported in English ships, forcing English c

NeX [460]

Acts of Trade and Navigation

Explanation:

The Navigation Acts, or more broadly the Acts of Trade and Navigation, was a long series of English laws that developed, promoted, and regulated English ships, shipping, trade, and commerce between other countries and with its own colonies. The laws also regulated England's fisheries and restricted foreigners' participation in its colonial trade.

5 0

3 years ago

What convinced Lord Cornwallis that victory in the Carolinas was unattainable despite a victory at the battle of Guilford Courth

vlabodo [156]

Answer:

The high number of British casualties needed to win at Guilford Courthouse

8 0

2 years ago

Mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm

Brums [2.3K]

Answer:

what do you mean by mmmmm

Explanation:

4 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers