Let’s start with the basics first… The Dust Bowl was the name given to the drought-stricken Southern Plains region of the United States, which suffered severe dust storms during a dry period in the 1930s. As high winds and choking dust swept the region from Texas to Nebraska, people and livestock were killed and crops failed across the entire region. The massive dust storms caused farmers to lose their livelihoods and their homes. Deflation from the Depression aggravated the plight of Dust Bowl farmers. Prices for the crops they could grow fell below subsistence levels. In 1932, the federal government sent aid to the drought-affected states. Now here is why it stopped or how we stopped it. While the dust was greatly reduced thanks to ramped up conservation efforts and sustainable farming practices, the drought was still in full effect in April of 1939. In the fall of 1939, rain finally returned in significant amounts to many areas of the Great Plains, signaling the end of the Dust Bowl. Hope this helps!
50 years after the Supreme Court decision struck down "separate but equal," scholastic opportunities for African-Americans have expanded. But inequality remains a major problem.<span>The barriers to fulfilling that vision, from family breakdown to persistent residential and educational segregation, remain formidable. Although there is a policy that says about being equal, the white people are still dominant to those who are black.</span>
D. Ellis Arnall
Ellis Arnall<span>was elected governor of Georgia in 1942; gave 18 year old citizens the right to vote</span>
Answer:
The correct answer is <u><em>B) Oversimplifications often ignore complex or contradictory evidence</em></u>
Explanation:
History is not always easy to study and the further we go back, the further we have to rely on second hand or third hand sources.
For example, in order to study something that happened 20 years ago is fairly easy since it would be recorded either in newspapers, books, or even video.
However, it is not always easy to draw conclusions when we are studying an event that took place 2,000 years ago.
Most of them times we rely on information passed on from generations before until finally someone wrote it down.
While many historians get tempted to Over-simply an event to draw certain conclusions, this should not be practiced as it creates a bias and forces us to study or even research for contradictory evidence. Sometimes, this contradictory evidence can completely change our understanding of the event.
Answer:
umm science I think....................
