It is a way soldiers impose moral order on the chaos and awful randomness of war's violence. It is a way they humanize war for themselves, for their buddies, and for civilians, too. Though Aristotle doesn't himself talk about guilt, it is the emotion that best expresses the conflict—the desire or obligation to help frustrated by the inability, through no fault of one's own, to do so. To not feel the guilt is to be numb to those pulls.
Answer:
A. It symbolizes the branding of Jews as outcasts in Nazi Germany.
Answer:
1 I talked to him on Monday. --> CAN'T CHANGE
2 I hated school when I was a teenager. --> I used to hate school when I was a teenager.
3 My parents didn't eat out very often. --> My parents didn't use to eat out very often.
4 We visited our grandmother every weekend. --> We used to visit our grandmother every weekend.
5 I went to the cinema with Mark yesterday. --> CAN'T CHANGE
6 Did you watch a lot of TV when you were a child? --> Did you use to watch a lot of TV when you were a child?
Explanation:
First, let's understand why we can't change numbers 1 and 5. "Used to" can be employed to refer to habitual actions in the past, that is, actions that happened frequently. In numbers 1 and 5, we are talking about a single action that happened at a specific time in the past, not about actions that happened often. Therefore, "used to" is not applicable to them.
All the other sentences are speaking of actions that happened often during a period of time in the past. If the sentence is affirmative, all we need to do is add "used to" before the main verb in its base form. If the sentence is negative, we use "didn't use to" before the main verb. Interrogative sentences place the auxiliary "did" before the subject, followed by "use to" and the main verb. Note that, in the negative and interrogative forms, it's "use", not "used".
Answer:
1.<em> The kindred of Cain crushed with his vengeance;</em>
2<em>The monster of evil, Greedy and cruel tarried but little,</em>.
Explanation:
The poem Beowulf is about a dangerous creature named Grendel who terrorized King Hrothgar of the Dane Kingdom. He would intercept the banquets held by the King and then slaughter anyone he laid his hands on, even eating them.
He was described as a descendant of Cain probably because of his vengeful hatred which made him take people's lives. The evidence is in this text from the poem:
<em> </em><em>The kindred of Cain crushed with his vengeance;</em>
<em />
He was also described as a monster because of the harm he perpetuated and his fearful physical features. The evidence is in this text:
<em>The monster of evil, Greedy and cruel tarried but little,</em>
He was later conquered by Beowulf who left his kingdom to come and defeat him.
