1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
SVEN [57.7K]
2 years ago
14

What were three advantages the United States had in the Mexican- American War? Explain in detail.

History
2 answers:
Soloha48 [4]2 years ago
6 0

Answer:

Explanation:

1. The U.S. had Superior Firepower

Artillery (cannons and mortars) was an important part of warfare in 1846. The Mexicans had decent artillery, including the legendary St. Patrick's Battalion, but the Americans had the best in the world at the time. American cannon crews had roughly double the effective range of their Mexican counterparts and their deadly, accurate fire made the difference in several battles, most notably the Battle of Palo Alto. Also, the Americans first deployed the "flying artillery" in this war: relatively lightweight but deadly cannons and mortars that could be swiftly redeployed to different parts of the battlefield as needed. This advance in artillery strategy greatly helped the American war effort.

2. Better Generals

The American invasion from the north was led by General Zachary Taylor, who would later become President of the United States. Taylor was an excellent strategist: when faced with the imposingly fortified city of Monterrey, he saw its weakness right away: the fortified points of the city were too far from one another: his battle plan was to pick them off one by one. The second American army, attacking from the east, was led by General Winfield Scott, probably the best tactical General of his generation. He liked to attack where he was least expected and more than once surprised his opponents by coming at them from seemingly out of nowhere. His plans for battles such as Cerro Gordo and Chapultepec were masterful. The Mexican Generals, such as the legendarily inept Antonio Lopez de Santa Anna, were way outclassed.

3. Better Resources

The American government committed plenty of cash to the war effort. The soldiers had good guns and uniforms, enough food, high-quality artillery and horses and just about everything else they needed. The Mexicans, on the other hand, were totally broke during the entire war. "Loans" were forced from the rich and the church, but still corruption was rampant and the soldiers were poorly equipped and trained. Ammunition was often in short supply: the Battle of Churubusco might have resulted in a Mexican victory, had ammunition arrived for the defenders in time.

kati45 [8]2 years ago
4 0

Answer:

The advantages that the United States had were that it was wealthier, larger, and more populous than Mexico. America also had industries to supply it with arms and ammunition as well as a larger and better navy and more advanced artillery.

You might be interested in
Were the founding fathers justified in rebelling against the British government? In a well developed essay
kupik [55]

Answer:

Yes. The Founding Fathers were very influenced by the Enlightenment movement, especially by the philosopher John Locke. ... Because of that, the Founding Fathers justified the rebellion against the British.The colonists were justified in rebelling against the British due to several reasons, a large part being Locke's reasoning. The colonists also stated that due to the acts and the manners he committed them, they would write up a series of complaints which would stand as the pinnacle of the declaration of independence.

Explanation:

I hope it's help you◉‿◉

7 0
3 years ago
One demand of the abolition movement in the 1800s was
ExtremeBDS [4]

Answer:

The immediate freeing of all enslaved peoples.

Explanation:

After the 1800s - or after the Second Great Awakening - abolitionist wanted immediate freedom of all enslaved peoples as well as their acceptance into US society.

8 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why do we need to be attentive in checking the condition of tools amd equipment in making an icing?​
ankoles [38]

We need to be attentive for the conditions of equipment and tools used for the purpose of making icing because any defect in the tool can destroy the decoration over the icing.

  • Icing is a process of decoration of the cake or pudding or any other sweet dish using cream and other type of toppings like nuts, fruits, colored fennel, and other ingredients.
  • For icing one has to be very attentive as it can damage the beauty of the cake , or pudding over which the icing is done.
  • The defective tools and equipment can destroy the icing.
  • The defective tools and equipment must be checked as they will leak the cream on the cake or pudding.
  • The defective tools and equipment will not allow to make designs like flowers, stars, cartoons, and other designs.
  • To make effective and decorative designs on the cakes or pudding one has to check the effectiveness of the tools and equipment used for icing.

Learn more about tools:

brainly.com/question/22909204

4 0
2 years ago
40)
makvit [3.9K]
Sons of liberty sounds familiar so I say D
7 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What was one of the main reasons the Carolina colony eventually split into two separate colonies
aleksley [76]
From the beginning, the Lords Proprietors had difficulty in managing their new colony. There were border disputes with Virginia, Indian wars with the Tuscarora and the Yamassee, and piracy at the hands of the notorious Blackbeard and Stede Bonnet.

A portion of Carolina had emerged as its own organizational unit and became the royal colony of South Carolina in 1719. Advisors to the British king recommended direct royal control of the colonies.

In 1729 seven of the eight Lord Proprietors sold their colonial holdings in Carolina to the Crown. The lone Proprietor was John Carteret, Earl Granville, who retained the Granville Tract in North Carolina without governing control until the American Revolution.

In South Carolina the last Governor appointed by the Lord Proprietors ended his term in 1719, whereas the last Governor appointed by the Lords Proprietors in North Carolina ended his term in 1731. In 1719, the new Governor of South Carolina was "elected by the people," and was considered to be the first governor of South Carolina in the "Royal Period," that is - after "the Split."

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • The greatest Mogul king was
    13·2 answers
  • Nomadic who came from the plains of north china
    5·1 answer
  • What was the United States major concern during the Cold War?
    10·1 answer
  • After World War One, were countries entirely dependant on the continued involvement of the United States in terms of World affai
    6·1 answer
  • Which of the following is associated with Jacksonian Democracy?
    12·1 answer
  • As the ottoman empire crumbled, russia plotted to seize the bosporus and dardanelles in order to
    9·1 answer
  • What is an organization owned by many people but treated by law as though it were a single person?
    5·1 answer
  • What vocabulary terms means the national or central government that is
    11·1 answer
  • Types of grass lands​
    8·2 answers
  • How did lincoln make sure the emancipation proclamation was within his constitutional authority ?
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!