The additive inverse of a complex z is a complex number
so that
Finding
If you're having problems understanding this answer, try seeing it through your browser: <span>
brainly.com/question/2159647</span>I hope this helps.
Tags: <em>complex number additive inverse opposite algebra</em>
The answer would be D) 98.8% because if the initial price is $25 per share, then Gavin would have spent $12,500. None of the other answers make sense since if it was just 3% or 82.3%, then it would be too much to equal $150 in return. If you were to put C, then the shares would equal $4.43 each, and If you bought 500 shares, then it would equal $2,212.5 which would be way more than $150. In the other hand, D is correct because then only 1 share would equal $0.3 and that multiplied by 500 equals precisely $150.
Hope this helps!
Gdfgffggfdgdfgfdgfggfggfgfgfgfgfffdfdffgg
-Brainly support team (Klara academic DEPT.)Spam words mean team is having trouble determining the question CONTACT For support. Thanks for using brainly.
Answer:
B. -3, -10, -17, -24, -31
Step-by-step explanation:
An Arithmetic sequence is defined as a set of numbers with a common difference. In answer choice B, it is seen that the difference between each number is seven.
A is incorrect as one to eight has a difference of seven, while the other numbers have a difference of eight.
C is incorrect as it skips the number 12 between 9 and 15, thus breaking the sequence.
D is incorrect as the numbers jump from positive to negative, thus not having a common difference.
Hope this helps!
