<img src="https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%20%5Csqrt%7B%20-%2064%7D%20" id="TexFormula1" title=" \sqrt{ - 64} " alt=" \sqrt{

All categories

photoshop1234 [79]

3 years ago

gn="absmiddle" class="latex-formula">
imaginary numbers

Mathematics

1 answer:

LenKa [72]3 years ago

4 0

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

You might be interested in

what is the relationship between 5.34 x 10^5 and 5.34 x 10^-2 is it greater or lesser than? for 5.34 x 10^5? will give brainlies

Romashka-Z-Leto [24]

the relationship between 5.34 x 10^5 and 5.34 x 10^-2

$5.34 x 10^5 = 5.34*100000= 534000$

5.34 * 10^-2 , for exponent -2 we move the decimal point 2 places to the left

$5.34 x 10^-2= 0.0534$

Now we compare 534000 and 0.0534

0.0534 is 10,000,000 times less than 534000

Or we can say 534000 is 10,000,000 times greater than 0.0534

$5.34 x 10^5$ is 10,000,000 times greater than $5.34 x 10^-2$

3 0

3 years ago

How would I graph this inequality? <img src="https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=7x%2B3y%5C%20%20%5Ctextless%20%5C%206-5x" id="TexFormul

Anon25 [30]

Answer:

the graph in the attached figure

Step-by-step explanation:

we have

$7x+3y$

isolate the variable y

Subtract 7x both sides

$3y$

Divide by 3 both sides

$y$

The solution of the inequality is the shaded area below the dashed line

The equation of the shaded line is $y=-4x+2$

The slope of the dashed line is negative $m=-4$

The y-intercept of the dashed line is the point $(0,2)$

The x-intercept of the dashed line is the point $(0.5,0)$

To graph the inequality plot the intercepts and shade the area below the dashed line

using a graphing tool

the graph in the attached figure

3 0

3 years ago

18+5+(5-3)x6 divided by 3-2

Ainat [17]

My little pony jdcnhbbsachbshcbahcbhsbchbhcsabksbhbcsh

8 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Set of real numbers list the set to which each number belongs??

Andre45 [30]

Answer:

all numbers natural,integer,rational,real algebra comes under real numbers

except the equations with alphabets

3 0

3 years ago

A manufacturer of chocolate candies uses machines to package candies as they move along a filling line. Although the packages ar

Elenna [48]

Answer:

We conclude that the mean amount packaged is equal to 8.17 ounces.

Step-by-step explanation:

We are given that in a particular sample of 50 packages, the mean amount dispensed is 8.171 ounces, with a sample standard deviation of 0.052 ounces.

Let $\mu$ = population mean amount packaged.

So, Null Hypothesis, $H_0$ : $\mu$ = 8.17 ounces {means that the mean amount packaged is equal to 8.17 ounces}

Alternate Hypothesis, $H_A$ : $\mu\neq$ 8.17 ounces {means that the mean amount packaged is different from 8.17 ounces}

The test statistics that will be used here is One-sample t-test statistics because we don't know about the population standard deviation;

T.S. = $\frac{\bar X-\mu}{\frac{s}{\sqrt{n} } }$ ~ $t_n_-_1$

where, $\bar X$ = sample mean amount dispensed = 8.171 ounces

s = sample standard deviation = 0.052 ounces

n = sample of packages = 50

So, the test statistics = $\frac{8.171-8.17}{\frac{0.052}{\sqrt{50} } }$ ~ $t_4_9$

= 0.1359

The value of t-test statistics is 0.1359.

Also, the P-value of test-statistics is given by;

the meaning of the p-value is that the p-value is the probability of obtaining a sample mean that is equal to or more extreme than 0.001 ounces away from8.17 if the null hypothesis is true.

P-value = P( $t_4_9$ > 0.136) = More than 40% {from the t-table}

Since the P-value of our test statistics is more than the level of significance of 0.01, so we have insufficient evidence to reject our null hypothesis as it will not fall in the rejection region.

Therefore, we conclude that the mean amount packaged is equal to 8.17 ounces.

6 0

3 years ago