Yes, it is true that the equilibrium theory of social change does not explain widespread social change within or <u>between societies.</u>
<h3>What is the equilibrium theory of social change? </h3>
The <em>equilibrium theory </em>explains the likelihood of the social system to again reach a <u>state of balance</u> when any change occurs in the society. Hence, the internal and external <em>relationship</em> between social elements is maintained.
Therefore, the social changes in different societies could not be measured as the equilibrium measures the social forces of a given society only.
Learn more about social theories here;
brainly.com/question/4123668
Low morale, after winning very many battles Rome stopped wearing helmets and other armor during battle, they also became more infatuated with the arts than building as a city. This lead to their defeat when attacked by other cities. Hope this help! Also I did an essay on this specific topic before so if you have anymore questions let me know.
Answer:
,lkkkkkgjffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffjkmm
Explanation:
