<span>Her therapist is demonstrating "unconditional positive regard".
Unconditional positive regard refers to an idea created by the humanistic analyst Carl Rogers, is the essential acknowledgment and support of a man paying little heed to what the individual says or does. Rogers trusted that unrestricted positive respect is fundamental for sound improvement and endeavored to set up it as a remedial part. Through giving unqualified positive respect, humanistic advisors look to enable their customers to acknowledge and assume liability for themselves.
</span>
The correct interpretation of this case is that antibiotic A is the only one that effectively fights the patient's bacteria.
<h3>How to interpret the results?</h3>
To interpret the results of this case, we must take into account the manifestations that occur with respect to the antibiotic samples A, B, C and D and their reaction with the bacteria in the patient's wound.
According to the above, it can be inferred that antibiotic A eliminated the bacteria, while the other three antibiotics allowed the proliferation of bacteria.
Learn more about antibiotics in: brainly.com/question/10868637
#SPJ1
By this statement, Tim wants to say that judges do not depend on voter will to keep their jobs. If that were the case, then judges would make decisions based on popular will rather than interpretations of the law.
<h3>Who are federal judges?</h3>
Federal judges are judges who serve in a federal court. They are nominated by the president and confirmed by the senate.
Tim means that judges do not depend on voter will to keep their jobs. If that were the case, then judges would make decisions based on popular will rather than interpretations of the law.
Therefore, A is the correct option.
Learn more about Federal judges here:
brainly.com/question/15877634
#SPJ1
Answer:
Crocodiles, Alligators, and Snakes
Explanation:
