The vehicles worth at the end of its lease.
Answer:
Total direct labor cost= $122,752
Explanation:
Giving the following information:
Each unit of output requires 0.77 direct labor-hours.
The direct labor rate is $11.20 per direct labor-hour.
Production budget:
October= 7,100 units
November= 6,900 units
Minimum hours= 5,480 hours
First, we need to determine the number of hours required for each month.
October= 7,100*0.77= 5,467 hours
November= 6,900*0.77= 5,313 hours
Direct labor budget:
October= 5,480*11.2= 61,376
November= 61,736
Total cost= $122,752
Answer:
The percentage change in nominal GDP from 2013 to 2014 was 4.29%
The percentage change in real GDP from 2012 to 2013 was 1.48%
The percentage change in real GDP from 2012 to 2013 was higher than the percentage change in real GDP from 2011 to 2012. FALSE
Explanation:
In order to calculate this we just have to calculate the percentages with a rule of thirds:
To calculate the first one we use the nominal GDP which is the GDP with the current market value:
To calculate the change in real GDP we use the values adapted to a pre-agreed monetary value, in this case the dollar at 2009:
To calculate the 2011 to 2012 we insert the values:
So with this we know that it is wasn´t higher the percentage change from 2012-2013, than that of 2011-2012
The correct answers to these open questions are the following.
Maple Farms, Inc. v. City School District of Elmira.
Could something like this bankrupt a company?
Yes, it can, if the proper forecast were not done taking into consideration all of the possible variables at medium and long-range.
Do you agree with the decision?
It was a tough decision because the court declared in its decision that the performance was not impracticable, as Maple Farm Inc indicated when decided to break the contract.
In strict theory, I agree with the court's decision because the explanation was that an "impractical" occurred when an event happened totally unexpected. And in this case, Mapple Farm Inc could have taken extra provisions knowing that milk had a 10% increase the last year and had the chance of more increases in the present year.
That is how a company can avoid this type of situation. Taking better provisions, contemplating all kinds of variables, knowing that in the future, something unexpected can happen and could be prevented with the proper forecast.
a balance achieved between two desirable but incompatible features; a compromise.
"a trade-off between objectivity and relevance"
