Answer:
Regionalism
Explanation:
Regionalism is one of the political ideologies that focuses on the welfare and progression of a region particularly. The region can be a divided on the terms of religion, administration, culture and language. Regionalists intend towards the progression, development and upliftment of the people living in the region. This helps in brining the state, society and people come in contact and share certain responsibilities towards each other.
Cultural imperalism is the answer
Answer:
The answer is D.
Explanation:
Southeast Asia consists of eleven countries that reach from eastern India to China, and is generally divided into “mainland” and “island” zones. The mainland (Burma, Thailand, Laos, Cambodia, and Vietnam) is actually an extension of the Asian continent.
Deforestation can represent the impact that colonialism had on the region
Answer: Option A
<u>Explanation:</u>
Colonialism is the colonizing of a country by some other country which was more powerful and had more authority. Colonies are made because the powerful countries search for natural resources, wealth, precious items in their colonies.
These colonies are also a place for raw material or for increasing trade of the finished goods of the country. All this leads to exploitation of the colonies also leading to deforestation where colonies have to cut down their trees and damage the environment for the benefits of the colonists.
Answer:
Hybridization may drive rare taxa to extinction through genetic swamping, where the rare form is replaced by hybrids, or by demographic swamping, where population growth rates are reduced due to the wasteful production of maladaptive hybrids. Conversely, hybridization may rescue the viability of small, inbred populations. Understanding the factors that contribute to destructive versus constructive outcomes of hybridization is key to managing conservation concerns. Here, we survey the literature for studies of hybridization and extinction to identify the ecological, evolutionary, and genetic factors that critically affect extinction risk through hybridization. We find that while extinction risk is highly situation dependent, genetic swamping is much more frequent than demographic swamping. In addition, human involvement is associated with increased risk and high reproductive isolation with reduced risk. Although climate change is predicted to increase the risk of hybridization‐induced extinction, we find little empirical support for this prediction. Similarly, theoretical and experimental studies imply that genetic rescue through hybridization may be equally or more probable than demographic swamping, but our literature survey failed to support this claim. We conclude that halting the introduction of hybridization‐prone exotics and restoring mature and diverse habitats that are resistant to hybrid establishment should be management priorities.
Explanation:
