Answer:
Chaos would ensure eventually.
Explanation:
Social norms are necessary in a society because they are a road map to proper behavior. Any society needs norms because people are creatures of habits. They need to be told what is acceptable and what not, and how to behave in ways not damaging to others.
If social norms were to be abolished, people would rejoice first, thinking they are free to do what they want to do without having to obey anything imposed on them. With time, however, they would lose any kind of orientation and would start missing guidance in life. Not knowing any rules, they would change their ways of acting with others, concentrating mainly on their own needs and their survival. Chaos would break out as people would fight against one another not knowing how to behave, whom to obey or what values are acceptable and what not.
No, because if they are not already a part of the corporation itself then they cannot act as if it does not exist. That is like looking the other way when in factr you still have to follow rules and laws regardless of what you think you are or are not.
Answer: It shows whether a decision will produce more gains than losses
Explanation:
I got it right APEX
Answer:
Hitler.
Explanation:
I'm not kidding, that was guy.
Answer: Review legal conclusions reached by lower federal courts
Explanation: Court of Appeals is empowered to review all final decisions and certain interlocutory decisions of district courts within its jurisdiction, except those few decisions that are appealable directly to the Supreme Court of the United States.
U.S. court of appeals is empowered to review legal conclusions reached by lower federal courts.
