Political scientist Richard Neustadt contended that an effective president is successful in using t<u>he power to persuade,</u>
<u />
Thus Neustadt's thesis: Presidential strength isn't the power to direct but the strength to influence. The president can not accomplish a lot by using merely issuing orders. Getting things finished requires persuading others that appearing to enhance the president's dreams is in their own first-rate interest.
Richard Elliott Neustadt (June 26, 1919 – October 31, 2003) became an American political scientist specializing in the united states of America presidency. He also served as an adviser to several presidents. He becomes the writer of the books Presidential electricity and, with Harvey V.
The constitution specifies two assets of presidential power: Expressed powers consist of the strength to make treaties, provide pardons and nominate judges.
Learn more about Neustadt's thesis here: brainly.com/question/13520540
#SPJ4
<u />
<u />
<u />
The answer is "Yes. It is often appropriate to praise the losers of a competition."
Competition is far superior for the loser in my estimation than the champ, given the right attitude. Losing is transitory. Much the same as winning is and simply as is life. With regards to time we can value the fleeting idea of any lose and discover the exercise.
Explanation:
through the teaching of our elders,enlightment of the materials but i suggest that tou should check on goggle for proper explanation
Answer:
Two-Thirds
Explanation:
The Constitution provides that an amendment may be proposed either by the Congress with a two-thirds majority vote in both the House of Representatives and the Senate or by a constitutional convention called for by two-thirds of the State legislatures.