4. Add encouraging words while giving feedback.
* This is a good practice in terms of feedback. It is good to highlight strengths as you point out areas of improvement. Through encouragement, they are able to feel that improvement is a possibility for them.
For number 1, when offering criticism, you are not looking for an apology. you are looking to encourage improvement.
As for number 2, although it is good to make things clear, workers or people typically respond better to rewards rather than punishment.
Number 3, is not a good practice because constructive criticism should be done privately and not in a group setting. It may make the receiver feel like they are being singled-out.
Number 5, the point of criticism is to point out areas of improvement and at the same time, show or give examples as to how they can improve. Giving solutions and ideas during feedback will help the receiver understand what they did wrong and how they were supposed to do it.
Answer:
(b) no, because the promise was illusory
Explanation:
He rebuilt canals.
He established new cities.
He established a good taxation system.
Explanation:
From 1774 to 1789, the Continental Congress served as the government of the 13 American colonies and later the United States. The First Continental Congress, which was comprised of delegates from the colonies, met in 1774 in reaction to the Coercive Acts, a series of measures imposed by the British government on the colonies in response to their resistance to new taxes. In 1775, the Second Continental Congress convened after the American Revolutionary War (1775-83) had already begun. In 1776, it took the momentous step of declaring America’s independence from Britain. Five years later, the Congress ratified the first national constitution, the Articles of Confederation, under which the country would be governed until 1789, when it was replaced by the current U.S. Constitution.
Answer:
The implications of Radical Skepticism for knowledge and for the rest of life is described below in details.
Explanation:
Radical skepticism is the thoughtful condition that experience is most likely unattainable. Radical skeptics believe that uncertainty endures as to the truthfulness of every faith and that assurance is therefore never explained. The cause for this is that accurately represented, radical skepticism is expected to be nonsense, in that it presents deep anxiety in our epistemological theories.
