Answer:
Bob contributed to his injury and apportioned damages
Explanation:
Under pure form of comparative negligence, a defendant is only responsible for the proportion of fault arising out of his negligence. The plaintiff is still allowed a compensation against damages even if he himself contributed to such a fault.
Comparative negligence mentions that whenever an accident takes place, the total negligence is a sum of proportionate negligence by each party, which contributed to such accident.
In such case, the negligence for an accident cannot be placed upon one party alone.
In the given case, since Bob filed a suit in a state that adopts pure form of comparative negligence, he shall be eligible to some compensation even if the fault was majorly his. Though, the quantum of compensation shall be based upon the determined fault of each party to the accident.
Answer:
1. There are many potential reasons, including: competition over territory and resources, historical rivalries and grievances, and in self defense against an aggressor or a perceived potential aggressor. War arises because of the changing relations of numerous variables--technological, psychic, social, and intellectual. There is no single cause of war. Peace is an equilibrium among many forces.
2. Talk directly. Assuming that there is no threat of physical violence, talk directly to the person with whom you have the problem. ...
Choose a good time. ...
Plan ahead. ...
Don't blame or name-call. ...
Give information. ...
Listen. ...
Show that you are listening. ...
3. Usually people think that conflict cannot be solved by war, it should be solved with negotiations. ... These are things that cannot be determined by cooperation and negotiation talks. People must be hurt in order to solve issues; the end justifies the means. Hence war is a suitable mechanism to end conflict!
Explanation:
Answer:
incorporation of the Bill of Rights
Hope this helps!
The correct answer is true. It is because with immoral living, an individual likely does things that violates the law or do things that are considered to be wrong as one doesn't know to differentiate what is right and wrong, by this, it is likely that the person doesn't know what is right or what is true that may lead him or her to formulate false doctrine.<span />