1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
MrRa [10]
3 years ago
15

Which development would most likely reduce the standard of living in the

History
1 answer:
Liono4ka [1.6K]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

A. It becomes more difficult for U.S. citizens to get health care.

Explanation:

If people cannot have access to healthcare, there will be more illnesses/injuries and it will decrease the standard of living. If people start traveling to different states, that won't affect the standard of living in any way. If factories begin producing goods at a faster rate, it will be convenient for people. I don't know what the gold standard is but I'm assuming it's a good thing, so that isn't the answer. The only negative thing is answer choice, so that is the answer.

You might be interested in
Which of the following acts implemented through the Intolerable Acts did American
Afina-wow [57]

Answer:

Quartering Acts

Explanation:

lmk if it’s wrong !

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What did the policy of appeasement result in?
vekshin1
C. It allowed Germany to occupy other countries like Czechoslovakia.
5 0
3 years ago
What do you think is the allure ( draw /appeal ) of the western
nordsb [41]

Answer:

The United States desired the West because the West coast would open up the United States to Asian markets.  Eastern ports connected the U.S with Europe.  The West meant we could expand our trading power globally.  

The population was rapidly growing in the East, Americans were running out of room, they had to move West.

Economic hardships (panics and depressions) in the East pushed Americans to the West.

The West had abundant,  inexpensive, and often free, land. This not only attracted eastern Americans, but poor, landless Europeans as well.

The British had their eyes on the West as well.  Prior to the Annexation of Texas, Britain had established a friendly relationship with the Republic of Texas.  They were interested in trading with Texas and keeping the U.S from expanding West.  In order to limit British influence in America, the United States decided to Annex Texas in 1845.

7 0
3 years ago
Why were Robert Peary's notes from his trip to the North Pole so important?
aleksandr82 [10.1K]

Answer:

the person who answered should be right

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
How do cattle provide a resource for non-farmable land
Dovator [93]
Your answer should be C.

They aren't necessarily cheaper, nor does it matter about the quantity, they also don't help the land much.
7 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • How does the cartoon portray the US point of view?
    13·1 answer
  • Which of the buildings is the Taj Mahal? A B C
    6·2 answers
  • What was used by the monarchs to unify Spain under Christianity and consolidate their power.
    5·1 answer
  • What statement best describes Japan's trading policies with Europe?
    6·1 answer
  • Read Spanish Conquistador Hernán Cortés’s description of the Aztec capital, Tenochtitlán, and then answer the question that foll
    11·2 answers
  • Línea de tiempo sobre la resistencia andina desde 1531 hasta 1572
    11·1 answer
  • Richard Nixons Strategy for ending American Involvement in the Vietnam War entailed?
    7·1 answer
  • Plz helpppp..... it’s a test
    10·1 answer
  • What is blitzkrieg and how does it work?
    14·1 answer
  • Read the following excerpt from Federalist #3 by John
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!