To know which is more effective, let's just put a fictional number of 100 purchase to test it.
Option A: $2 per person, 60% purchase
Option B: $0.1 per person, 2% purchase
For Option A, cost would be $200 and ended up in 60 purchases
For option B, cost would be $10 and ended up in 2 purchases (if the cost is lifted into $ 200, the purchases is 2 x10 = 20)
Which means option A is more effective.
Answer:
The correct answer is letter "E": Efficiency.
Explanation:
The American Academy of Professional Coders (AAPC) is the organization in the U.S. in charge of certifying administrative workers of the healthcare system such as <em>billers, coders, </em>and <em>practice managers</em>. The certifications the AAPC provides are <em>medical coding, medical auditing, physician practice management</em>, just to mention a few.
Within its code, the AAPC establishes five (5) principles of professional conduct which are <em>integrity, respect, commitment, competence, </em>and <em>fairness</em>. Efficiency is not one of them.
The abuse of pay-per-click, pay-per-call and pay-per-conversation revenue models by repeatedly clicking on a link to increase charges or cost for the advertiser is called click fraud.
I'd recommend a "rain check", suggesting that as soon that specific product is replenished, you'll reserve one for them so this wouldn't happen again. I would also apologize for not having been prepared, and offer a small coupon or two as a form of compensation for the inconvenience. (That is, if you're able to offer coupons.) Another thing that would be important is to display professionalism in a stressful situation. That will show your higher ups that you are an asset to the business. Hope I helped! :)