Answer:
The major premise is lack of House to pay attention towards the road ahead of him and the rule of contributory negligence. By using this jurisdiction, the plaintiff's damages will be reduced.
Explanation:
- The defendant driver, while he may ultimately be liable if all of the witnesses say he ran the stop sign, will raise the comparative fault of House for failing to keep a proper lookout and failing to take evasive action to avoid a collision.
- The defenses are the same as they would be if the collision was with another car instead of a bicycle.
- House had an ordinary duty to pay attention to the road ahead of him and keep himself and others safe.
- By watching his books and not the traffic, he breached that duty.
- I'm not saying that defense will be successful, but that's what would be alleged by the car's driver as a defense.
- In most states, the damages to the plaintiff will be reduced by the percentage of his/her comparative fault (also known in some jurisdictions as contributory negligence).
- In some states, if the plaintiff's comparative fault is shown to be over 50%, there will be no recovery at all.
Answer:
I belive its B.
because it doesn't mention that in the Bill of rights...I believe:/
Most likely taxes because all the other answers are things that people desire for/of their government, although economics could also be a potential answer, but I’m leaning towards taxes
The given statement “It is well understood and specified that the privileges prolonged under the Habeas corpus writ is not suspended until unless there is a case of rebel” is true.
Answer: Option 1
<u>Explanation:
</u>
The case where there is rebel or in case of invasion, the suspension is achieved for the Habeas corpus writ. This is in accordance to the suspension clause of the constitution with the section of 9 in clause second under the Article 1.
The rebel or invasion is for the requirement of public safety as in regard. If in the case raised, then the President, only one who had the power to suspend it as per the constitution.
Answer:
k = rate constant
A & B = reactants
x & y = reactant orders
Given reaction: aA + bB + C → dD + eE
Rate Law: Rate = k[A]q[B]r[C]s
Explanation:
