Answer:
Explanation:
Utterly true.
I once asked my wife to teach me to draw an Erlenmeyer flask. She showed me, and she's a good teacher. Then she said "Draw 50 of these. By the time you've done that, you should see how the lines work." She was wrong. My first flask was no worse nor better than the 50th one and I never did see how the lines worked.
I can do math, but my drawings look like I never graduated from Grade 1.
Do US Constitution provides the floor beneath individual rights, well stating constitutions can provide greater but not lesser protection. So I think it’s c but I’m not sure!!
Extends the tap-and-trace provisions of existing wiretap statutes to the Internet, and mandates certain technological modifications at ISPs to facilitate electronic wiretaps on the Internet
.
Option A
<u>
Explanation:
</u>
After the fall out of terrorist attacks on September 11 2001 American congress has passed the USA Patriot Act to protect the American society from the attack of terrorism.
This act specifically allows the federal agency officials to have control over the internet communication and they can intercept the local and foreign calls which are called tap and trace.
The purpose of tap and trace of calls is for collecting the information about the terrorist activities and also for foreign intelligence.
The right lane of a freeway is typically used for entering and departing traffic flow. It's a staging lane that you'll use at the start and finish of your freeway journey. The main lanes are designated for through traffic, while the left lane is designated for passing.
<h3>What exactly is the Move Over law?</h3>
This is the law in the United States that mandates all road users to move out of the lane next to all stopped emergency vehicles.
B. The alternatives that drivers must follow are as follows:
• If they are traveling at a slow speed.
• To go at a substantially slower speed than the speed limit.
Therefore the law applicable is Move over law.
For more information about Move over law refer to the link:
brainly.com/question/1223628
Answer:
Explanation:
The case of Max v. National Credit Co. is heard in a trial court. The case of O! Boy! Ice Cream Co. v. Pecan Corp. is heard in an appellate court. The difference be-tween a trial and an appellate court is whether
