The answer is a sweeping generalization. It is applying a
general rule to a specific occasion without appropriate evidence. While the
opposite of the sweeping generalization is hasty generalization is applying a
specific rule to a general situation without proper evidence.
Answer: A encouraging voter registration
Explanation: I just got it wrong on apex from the person who gave the previous answer
Answer:
Total war is a strategy in which militaries use any means necessary to win. In that definition, I don't think it works. Because you are sacrificing things like money and people for example to just get a victory.
Answer:
The path we will take for this narrative will be starting to talk about social science, and then lead the public to wonder why they should care.
Explanation:
Your narrative can start like this:
"The social sciences are what we can commonly call "<em>the science of society</em>". Here the study of society and the behavior of the individuals who inhabit it will be highlighted.
Now, why should we care about the social sciences if they are not the ones in charge of solving society's problems?
The answer to this is a little more complex. Although solving the problems of a society differs from the social sciences, we must understand that both things are complementary. They need each other.
To solve society's problems, <u>we must first know them</u>. Have a study of the behaviors and problems that society faces in order to develop a solution to them. "
Due to the topic covered, the narrative will go better with examples. With this introduction you can begin to investigate different problems that society has, which have been analyzed through the social sciences.
Answer: It assumes family from all cultures are equivalent.
Explanation:
