I think e because a primary source is first hand so you know all the details about what's happening during that time.
The evidence that best supports the inference that Napoleon is falsely accusing Snowball of destroying the windmill are as follows:
• Option A: The animals were shocked beyond measure to learn that even Snowball could be guilty of such an action.
• Option C: Almost immediately the footprints of a pig were discovered in the grass.
• Option E: Napoleon snuffed deeply at them and pronounced them to be Snowball's.
The correct options can be better understood as mentioned below:
• The book being talked about is Animal Farm, written by George Orwell, in which the animals of a farm rebel against humans.
• Napoleon and Snowball were two pigs who wanted to be the leader. Napoleon would do anything to remove Snowball from the farm and therefore, he was quick to give the judgment against Snowball to get him removed from the farm forever.
Learn more about Animal Farm here:
brainly.com/question/13562952
The answer is Option A, because none of the other options fit the characteristics of a third person point of view.
Answer:
It means to search for multiple meanings to some words.
Explanation:
When people say to read between the lines, you have to look closely at the text. You have to think differently about meanings of words and sentences.
For example: "Johnny grinned. He passed the test! He laughed, but then he cringed, wincing."
This could be taken in different ways. You could say that he was happy he passed the test but because he was injured, he cringed when he laughed. However, you could also say that he laughed because he was happy he passed the test but he cringed because he remembered his grandma just died and he shouldn't be happy.
