Answer:
it's a run on sentence
Explanation:
if it helps you can follow me
Answer:
It definitely would have an ironic mood. It would have the reader feeling a sense of dread, knowing what's going to happen at the end.
Explanation:
The entire story except for the end of The Lottery was like a cheerful mood. The town was all gathered for a pleasant gathering, the lottery. However, once you reach the end of the story, it takes a dark turn, having the town members turn against the winner by throwing stones at her.
It would have an ironic mood once you read it for the second time because you know that all that cheerfulness and pleasantness of the town gathering is false, because they are planning to stone the winner because of tradition. Being ironic means that something unexpected happens, like the reverse of what you think would happen. It's like being sarcastic.
For example, if you studied for a test for 10 years and then find out the test you were studying for didn't exist anymore, it would be ironic.
So, reading The Lottery again would totally be ironic. It seems like they're all having a good time, but really they're going to kill one of their own. This goes hand in hand with the second question, how would knowing how the story ends change the whole thing. You're expecting a lighthearted gathering, but really you know that they are going to stone someone.
The first ten amendments<span>, the </span>Bill of Rights<span>, guarantee fundamental </span>rights<span> of individuals, including freedom of religion, speech, press, assembly, speedy jury trial in criminal cases, right to bear arms, protection against excessive bail, and cruel and unusual punishment.</span>
The subject of the independent clause in the sentence we are analyzing here is "The only people", and the verb is "were", as further explained below.
<h3>What is an independent clause?</h3>
An independent clause is a group of words that has a subject and a predicate. It conveys a full thought, which means it can be completely understood, without the need for other clauses.
The sentence we are analyzing here contains one independent clause and two subordinate clauses. The problem is that one of those subordinate clauses is placed between the subject and the verb of the independent clause, which makes it a bit confusing:
- Independent clause: The only people were a few Tarrageishan cannibals.
- First subordinate clause: who witnessed Duncan's misadventure.
- Second subordinate clause: who happened to be passing by.
Now that we know which one is the independent clause, we can easily identify its subject and verb:
- Subject - The only people.
With the information above in mind, we can conclude that the answer provided above is correct.
Learn more about independent clauses here:
brainly.com/question/25322033
#SPJ1
Logic.
You use logic to come to reasonable conclusions based on the information presented to you. The conclusion may be taken from assumptions made with limited information presented, or it might be based off of evidence, proof, thinking, or reasoning.
