Answer:
B. applying most Bill of Rights protections to state governments.
Explanation:
Incorporation, according to United States law is simply the way sections of the Bill of Rights are applied to state level instead of only federal level.
Before the 20th Century, most notably in 1833, the Supreme Court ruled that the Bill of Rights applied only to federal legal and not at state level. Also in 1876, the Supreme Court also ruled that the First and Second Amendment didn't apply to the state level.
However, from the early 1900s, there were decisions taken by the Supreme Court which interpreted that the Fourteenth Amendment was to incorporate many parts of the Bill of Rights and for the first time, it was applicable to state governments.
With a home equity loan, you can take out a one-time borrowing against the value of your house. While still leveraging the equity in a property, a HELOC enables homeowners to apply for an open line of credit. After that, you are permitted to take out loans as needed up to a specified limit.
What benefits do home equity lines offer?
HELOCs allow you to borrow in smaller quantities so that you only borrow what you need, when you need it, as opposed to home equity loans, which only let you borrow in one big sum. Your monthly payments will be smaller and you'll be less likely to accumulate debt if you just borrow what you actually need.
Learn more about home equity loan
brainly.com/question/28258410
#SPJ4
Answer:
A. Increase awareness of the differences in discourse conventions across different groups
Explanation:
According to the Gumperz reading and the video ‘Crosstalk’, the best way to address cross-cultural miscommunication is to <em>increase awareness of the differences in discourse conventions across different groups. </em>Gumpertz was a linguist who studied socio-linguistic and called it ethnography of communication. He studied the variation of discourse in different speech communities. The culture of the interlocutors affected both the discourse and meaning.
1778-1825) William McIntosh was a controversial chief of the Lower Creeks in early-nineteenth-century Georgia. His general support of the United States and its efforts to obtain cessions of Creek territory alienated him from many Creeks who opposed white encroachment on indianland.
