Answer:
A water snake gliding in the pool is caught by a heron and eaten while its tail waves frantically, and a strong wind blows into the clearing and dies down.
Hope this helped you.
Answer:
B.Sister
Explanation:
you need to add more context who is Annebelle ? who is Jessica ?
Answer:
Explanation:
War is completely different to that of Zaroff’s game The reason being is that there are rules to war. Zaroff’s game is mostly completely ruthless in which he does not care about the well being of the others he is hunting. While in war they are trying to not cause as much pain as possible. War is not like hunting, war is an armed conflict between two or more countries or even states in its own country. Zaroff’s hunting does have conflict but both sides do not have “arms” meaning that the men that Zaroff is hunting do not have guns or means to protect themselves. Another way war is completely different is that by hunting you are killing animals for sport and or food Zaroff sees the men he hunts as animals, but in war they kill the other men by either means to protect one’s self or to gain a tactical advantage over one another. War does change people, many people have to detach oneself from their experiences just to move on to live a normal life. But in war many times people go into deep depression mostly because of the fact that people die in war, those people could’ve been family, friends, even acquaintances but the fact that they are now dead and is bone chilling to the person and to the others that they have been known to.
Dereliction is a word for neglecting responsibilities. Failing to care for your family or do your job are examples of dereliction. Someone can be fired for dereliction of duty, meaning they have failed to do their job.
Answer:
C.
Explanation:
"The Selective Laziness Of Human Reasoning" is an article written by Tania Lombrozo. The aticle talks about how people tend to focus on the flaws of others argument than evaluating their own arguments. To prove this thesis, a research was conducted by the researchers in which the choice blindness concept was adopted. The choices that were made by the participants were swaped and mostly people failed to recognize the swap and presented their argument over the choice that they did not make previously.
<u>The correct option to support the claim of the main idea of the text is C. When the choices made by participants were swapped and not recognized by them, they produced the argument over the choice that they did not make and were critical about the arguments they produced when they were coming from others</u>.
So, the correct answer is option C.
