1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
viva [34]
3 years ago
11

which of the following best describes relations between colonists and american indians in the early days of the georgia

History
1 answer:
Charra [1.4K]3 years ago
8 0
<span>Assuming that this is referring to the same list of options that was posted before with this question, <span>the correct response would be "relatively civil," since Georgia was one of the more civil colonies when it came to Native/colonist relations--although this did not last for long. </span></span>
You might be interested in
Disputes over slavery in the 1840s and 1850s resulted in which of the following?
photoshop1234 [79]
Protesting. Simply that.
6 0
2 years ago
What country’s settlement of the New World was developed by its royalty?
sineoko [7]

Answer:

Spain

Explanation:

What country's settlement of the New World was developed by its royalty? Spain had settlement of the new world developed by its royalty.

5 0
2 years ago
Identify at least three ways in which medieval europe was affected by improved agricultural practices. why did improved farming
BARSIC [14]
Aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
8 0
3 years ago
"Prithvi Narayan Shah was an expert and far sighted politician and successful administrator." Explain.​
Serjik [45]

Answer:

PNS personally commanded many battles. The battles taught him how to handle complex situations and how he could come out victorious.

PNS focused on his goal and used all means (Saam, Daam, Danda, Bhed) for his campaign. As he fought battles, he understood why integrating the nearby kingdoms could be beneficial against the rising British hegemony in the region. He also realized that the diversity of Nepal could be exploited by British to divide the kingdom.

Explanation:

Prithvi Narayan Shah was not a strategist in the beginning. As soon as he became the king of Gorkha, he wanted to capture Nuwakot. In 1800 B.S., the first troop he sent under Biraj Thapa could not cross the Trishuli River. PNS, however, was not satisfied with the delay and sent another troop under Maheshwar Panta. The Gorkhali troop lost to the nature (Trishuli) as well the soldiers of Nuwakot.

After the loss, PNS became a military strategist. He went Benaras, brought some weapons and trained his soldiers so that they obey all commands without fear. He also developed the Marwat system for helping the soldier’s family if he died in a battle. He also used Yogis, the devotees of Gorakhnath, as spies.

He did not know how to use geography to strategical advantage before he himself led the Second Battle of Nuwakot in 1801 B.S. Had Kalu Pandey not found a way to divert huge number of Nuwakote soldiers, PNS could have died in the battle.

He had already understood politics, though. Before the Second Battle of Nuwakot, PNS had realized that the Chaubise Rajyas could be threat to his campaign and he might have to kill his kins in Kaski, Lamjung and Tanahun. To avoid the “sins”, he changed his gotra from Bhardwaj to Kasyap.

He also understood that Nepal (the then Kathmandu Valley—Kantipur, Patan, and Bhaktapur) would be against him as soon as he captured Nuwakot. So he kept a cordial relation with Ranjit Malla of Bhaktapur, who was also his Meet Baa (best friend’s father/father’s best friend)

PNS used the anarchy established by the Pradhans to make his brother Dal Mardan Shah the king of Patan from 1820–1822. When PNS attacked Kirtipur in 1822, Dal Mardan Shah did not oppose even though the Pradhans had urged him to do so. On Poush 3, 1822, PNS won the third battle of Kirtipur. Less than four years later, PNS was the king of Nepal.

PNS also understood how the people of Nepal Mandal lived. When he won the surrounding areas, he imposed a complete economic blockade which was one of the biggest reasons behind his victory over Kantipur, Patan and Bhaktapur.

Through treaties and diplomatic understandings, he was able to solve a lot of problems with the Chaubises and Baises, the British, the Tibetan and the Newas.

7 0
3 years ago
When right is implied by the second amendments right to bear arms
VLD [36.1K]
If this is a true or false question it sounds false..message me if I'm wrong about this.
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Why did the soviets think that western nations might invade the soviet union after world war ii?
    12·2 answers
  • What did japan,germany and italy do before ww2 began?
    7·2 answers
  • Feelings towards winston churchill agreement?
    11·2 answers
  • Which of the following reflects an accurate order of secession (first, second, third)?
    13·2 answers
  • How did the ten commandments compare to Hammurabi's code
    7·2 answers
  • these puppies were BORN in the same litter to the same parents. but they have DIFFERENT traits for the feature of toenail
    11·1 answer
  • PLZZ HELP MEEEEEEEEEE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    5·1 answer
  • 1. Identify three (3) major weaknesses of the Articles of Confederation. Be sure to give a specific example of each major weakne
    10·1 answer
  • Which two compontents of
    7·1 answer
  • Which were significant events that helped the allies win the war in europe? check all that apply.
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!