Why did the 1939 cash-and-carry amendment to the Neutrality Acts favor Britain over Germany?

2 answers:

6 0

The correct answer would be: The 1939 cash-and-carry amendment to the Neutrality Acts favored Britain over Germany because "Britain had a larger fleet of ships to carry arms than Germany".

With this amendment, lobbied by Roosevelt, the U.S. was allowed to trade arms with belligerent countries in Europe. The only condition was that the recipients provided transport and paid immediately in cash. Great Britain and France had absolute control of the seas, so the amendment put them at a massive advantage over Germany by being able to transport weaponery safely and freely.

Hope this helps!

maria [59]3 years ago

5 0

The Answer on Edginuity is A

You might be interested in

Where did the Mexican Indians find water?

Dmitriy789 [7]

Answer:

tierra

is the answer

Explanation:

pick me as the brainliest

6 0

2 years ago

Effective decision making requires comparing the added costs of the options with the added benefits

Juliette [100K]

It is true if that's what you're asking

5 0

2 years ago

based on what we've learned about the bad working conditions , during the industrial revolution , describe which examples from t

LenKa [72]

Most disturbing and horrific would probably be the way that workers could be mutilated by the machines or by human error and nobody would care about that. They would have to keep working without fingers or hands because not working would mean the end of their families. The injuries sometimes didn't have to be mutilation but were still severe.

6 0

2 years ago

Which section of the farm bill has a program for schools to replace “junk” food with fresh fruit and vegetables?

Alex787 [66]

Answer:

Title IV:Nutrition

Explanation:

8 0

2 years ago

During the reign of Augustus, the Senate:

ASHA 777 [7]

Answer:

Expanded its power.

Explanation:

In the reign of Augustus, the Senate were allowed to expand its power through series of policy of the emperor. Part of the reason why he did it was inorder to run an on inclusive goverment favourable to the people.

An example, is the ability of the Senate to summon Augustus during their senate meetings to explain some certain policies of his unlike previous reign where such is not possible.

7 0

3 years ago