On September 12, 1962, President John F. Kennedy delivered a speech at Rice University Stadium in Houston, Texas, in which he ap
pealed for support of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration’s program to land humans on the Moon. The following passage is an excerpt from Kennedy’s speech. Read the passage carefully. Compose a thesis statement you might use for an essay analyzing the rhetorical choices Kennedy makes to accomplish his purpose. Then select at least four pieces of evidence from the passage and explain how they support your thesis. In your response you should do the following: Respond to the prompt with a claim that establishes a line of reasoning. Select and use evidence to develop and support your line of reasoning. Explain the relationship between the evidence and your thesis. No man can fully grasp how far and how fast we have come, but condense, if you will, the 50,000 years of man’s recorded history in a time span of but a half-century. Stated in these terms, we know very little about the first 40 years, except at the end of them advanced man had learned to use the skins of animals to cover them. Then about 10 years ago, under this standard, man emerged from his caves to construct other kinds of shelter. Only five years ago man learned to write and use a cart with wheels. Christianity began less than two years ago. The printing press came this year, and then less than two months ago, during this whole 50-year span of human history, the steam engine provided a new source of power. Newton explored the meaning of gravity. Last month electric lights and telephones and automobiles and airplanes became available. Only last week did we develop penicillin and television and nuclear power, and now if America’s new spacecraft succeeds in reaching Venus, we will have literally reached the stars before midnight tonight. This is a breathtaking pace, and such a pace cannot help but create new ills as it dispels old, new ignorance, new problems, new dangers. Surely the opening vistas of space promise
This exposition propels uneven prove and clarifications in supporting its examination of Kennedy’s explanatory procedures. The primary illustration employments a family representation (father, senior child, and more youthful child) in arrange to recognize the triangulation of Kennedy, the steel administrators, and the American individuals within the discourse. The student’s utilize of the family representation disentangles the setting of the discourse, and the characterization of Kennedy’s tone as fatherly isn't totally well-suited. Be that as it may, the family similarity isn't entirely wrong; it permits the understudy to get it how Kennedy is in an definitive position to settle blame: he allots blame to the senior child (the steel industry) for pointlessly incurring torment on the more youthful one (an guiltless American open). In spite of the fact that the utilize of the allegory may be strained, it in any case succeeds in highlighting the workings of sentiment. As advance prove of the unevenness of this exposition, the moment section makes an satisfactory perception almost the differentiate between The two.
Usually, your third step is to hunt for clues like supporting details, vocabulary, dialogue. You will have to search through the specific passage and draw information based on the passage to make an inference.
