Answer:
similar coastal rock formations. b)
Volcanic eruptions can destroy building that store resources, burn trees, kill animals and make land not suitable for farming etc
An example of self-determination is the creation of Czechia and Slovakia.
Explanation:
The self-determination basically means that through the will of the people, a certain goal is a achieved usually(not always though) in peaceful manner, in this case ending a country and creating two new ones. Initially it was one country, Czechoslovakia. This country was composed of two main groups of people, the Czechs and Slovaks, and they peacefully collaborated and coexisted as a unit for several decades.
With the fall of the communism though, it became clear that the Czechs and the Slovaks have different ideals, and that they move into different directions. The people voted in a democratic manner to end the existence of Czechoslovakia, and to form to separate countries roughly divided with a border based on ethnic base. The formation of the new countries happened indeed and it was in totally peaceful manner, with the two countries retaining good relations.
Other examples of self-determination are:
- Creation of Macedonia, Serbia, Croatia, Slovenia, Bosnia out of Yugoslavia
- Creation of Austria and Hungary out of the Austria-Hungary Empire
- Creation of the Baltic states out of the Soviet Union
- Creation of Bulgaria, Greece, Lebanon etc. from the Ottoman Empire
Learn more about what happened to Austria-Hungary and the Ottoman Empire after the World War I brainly.com/question/12291274
#learnwithBrainly
Answer:
<u>The correct answer of the given statement above would be FALSE. </u>
<u>It is not true that migration doesn't really affect population. Migration affects population because if people come into another place, it changes that place's population. The place that they migrated will have an increase of population, and the place where they left will have a decrease of the population. Increase or decrease, this is still considered as a change. </u>
Explanation:
<u>Hope</u><u> </u><u>it helps</u><u> </u><u>you</u><u> </u><u>:</u><u>)</u><u> </u>
<u>Keep Learning</u><u> </u><u>:</u><u>)</u><u> </u>
Answer:
downwind of a nuclear power plant
Explanation:
Living in close proximity to a nuclear power plant or coal-burning plant is not something that would be preferable by most people, especially when it comes to living on the downwind side of them, but if I had to choose it will be living downwind of a nuclear power plant. The nuclear power plant is not a polluter of the air, so living downwind of it will not be a problem for the human health. The coal-burning plant, on the other hand, is one of the heaviest polluters of the air, as it releases enormous amounts of carbon dioxide. This will have very negative effects to the human health, so it is a situation to be avoided if possible. The nuclear plant does comes with a risk, as most things, but the chances are very small that a catastrophe will occur, and even if it does, it doesn't really matter on which side of it the people are living if they are in the same area as the plant.