No, it was not a wrong decision because the aim behind this was to develop the country through increase in trade.
<u>Explanation:</u>
The decision granted by the Mughal emperor Jahangir to trade with the East India company was done with the intention to increase the trade of the country with East India company and then lead to the growth and development of the country.
With the increase of the trade, there would be more employment opportunities in the country and there would be more choices with the consumers to increase their standards of living their life.
<u>Broad Context:</u> The "Big Picture" is that the US is trying to annex the Republic of Texas as part of their states, and that Texas already <em>shared many common traits </em>(why? part) with the US, and should join as a state of their choosing, (which means slave or free) (How? part).
<u>Other Context:<em> </em></u><em> </em>The adding of Texas into the US (eventually as a slave state) offsetted the balance between the slaves and free states, and so California (gained after the Mexican-American War) was turned into a free state. Texas was the cause of the Texas Revolution & later on the (already named) Mexican-American War. The adding of Texas, and later the Gadsen Purchase, help create today's US southern border that is shared with Mexico.
hope this helps
The Korean war lasted about three years but the Korean Armistice Agreement only ceased-fire. It did not end the war.
Meaning that it did not end after three years. It was only announced recently as of 2018 that the war might possibly come to a close after I believe at least over 60 years.
If the citizens were not required, no one may want to. On jury, you may have a case that may take a long time and you may end up sentencing someone to death. It is likely if citizens were not required that no one would want to volunteer.
Answer:
conservatism
Explanation:
think like the NRA, if your government is generally opressive, you are entilted to rebel, and then tear down the corrupt and build up a new,
